Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Health Care and Your Right to Life

Never underestimate the foolishness of anyone in a hurry. Get 535 people in a hurry at the same time, and it's Katie Bar the Door. That is what is happening to our health care in this country.

We all want to know we can go to the doctor when we need to. We also want to be able to extend our lives by undergoing a surgical procedure or taking medicine. The problem is, we still want it to cost what it did when a doctor could carry all his/her tools in a black leather bag.

The miraculous advance of medicine allows us to improve and extend our lives in ways we could not have imagined a few years ago. Instead of medicine being something that is practiced between an individual and one doctor, it is now practiced between an individual and the thousands of people whose skills are brought to bear on complex diseases. Think about an MRI machine and the almost unimaginable amount of knowledge that had to be brought together in one place for it to work.

In other words, we should expect that health care will cost more than it once did, just as a car with air conditioning and leather seats costs more than the vinyl benched oven-on-wheels we used to drive. Unfortunately, instead of letting bright and industrious people work on solutions to the problem of high health care costs, we have a government hard at work to destroy it.

Government will meddle and tinker, tinker and meddle, until they give us the equivalent of Social Security and Medicare. Hopelessly over-promised, national health care will, sooner rather than later, go broke.

What then?

They will ration care. Of course, no one will call it rationing. Instead, they will find yet another way to put lipstick on a pig and parade it around like a supermodel. Yet even in the midst of this, there is hope. As the public system crumbles, the irrepressible creative instincts of young men and women will be brought to bear on the practice of medicine. Bright people who want to use their talents to help others will find ways to offer care to the sick when they need it, not months down Waiting List Road.

This is already happening in Canada. Technically, most private care in Canada is illegal. This means that citizens cannot go outside the system by using private doctors. Fortunately, this law is rarely enforced. As a result, a host of private practices have sprung up, giving those who can pay the option of bypassing the waiting lists and suboptimal medical choices represented by the public system.

If we in the U.S. move toward a universal health care system, do not expect our government to learn anything from Canada's recent lessons. Expect instead that they will attempt to outlaw private practice. They will do so because as the public system breaks down, more doctors will move out of it in favor of serving the needs of the sick privately.

This is where the health care battle line should be drawn. The right to preserve and enhance our life and our health is as fundamental as the right to self-defense or free speech. Being forced to die or live as a cripple because one's care is not "cost-effective" enough for public funding, and then being denied the right to seek a private physician's services is an assault on any sane person's notion of freedom.

Allowed to flourish, the creative power of the human mind will bring forth new cures, new medical services, and longer, more enjoyable lives for all. New insurance structures, medical care cooperatives, and charities will emerge, providing care for those who truly cannot afford care. Instead of fighting and scratching for a limited resource, we can all contribute to creating more.

It is beginning to look like some form of government-run health care is inevitable. It won't be pretty, but it will be survivable unless they outlaw private care. If they do, consider it the equivalent of censorship or illegal search and seizure. It's your right, don't let them take it.

4 comments:

  1. Great article, Terry! It looks as if the best thing we can do is to stay healthy and avoid the need for medical intervention; lifestyle choices become even more important. Prevention is, indeed, the best "medicine." Barbara

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, Terry, care is already rationed by the hmo's et al. I know this from personal experience. You might check out Hans Rosling on TED talks and see how he concludes from 60 years of health data that in order to get rich as a nation one has to go for health first, not the other way around. I have been to a few emergency rooms lately and that is not health care, but the children I saw there were reduced to that kind of access. 60% of bankruptcies are medical expense induced and 80% of those had medical insurance. It's broken, dude, and for our nation to rise we need all of us with at least a hope for health.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks, Tellio. I only checked out Rosling briefly, so I will reserve comment until I am better informed. If I follow your argument, it seems to be that we need to spend more on health care in the public sector. I do not believe that is a proper role of government, but understand that others may differ. Let's focus, then, on your comment about rationing.

    Yes, HBOs do "ration" in a certain sense. The question is, how did they get into a position where they could hold that much sway over medicine? Certainly not from a truly free market. Insurance regulations preclude insurance sales across state lines and the formation of coalitions among small businesses to purchase insurance--just two examples of how politicians and insurance lobbyists pair up to get re-elected and make more money, respectively.

    People have an amazing capacity to remedy their own ills when given the freedom to do so. This includes insurance companies. No one, least of all me, thinks all our health care issues will disappear when government gets out of the economy altogether. But it will allow us to unleash the creativity of countless individuals to solve our problems instead of having lobbyists, bureaucrats, and politicians rig the system.

    If I may, let me put you on the spot. Would you advocate the outlawing of private health care purchases by people who can afford it?

    ReplyDelete